SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1533317508317817v1
23/3/262    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olde Rikkert, M. G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waldemar, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olde Rikkert, M. G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waldemar, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Consensus Statement on Genetic Research in Dementia

Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert*, Anco van der Vorm, Alistair Burns, Wim Dekkers, Philipp Robert, Norman Sartorius, Jacques Selmes, Gabriela Stoppe, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, and Gunhild Waldemar

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: M.Olde-Rikkert{at}ger.umcn.nl.


  Abstract
In this article, the authors describe how the European Dementia Consensus Network developed a consensus on research ethics in dementia, taking into account the questions posed by the era of genetic research and its new research methods. The consensus process started with a Delphi procedure to analyze relevant stakeholders’ positions by describing their statements on the possibilities and limitations of research into genetic determinants of Alzheimer disease and to describe and analyze the moral desirability of genetic research on Alzheimer disease. The conclusions drawn from the Delphi procedure fuelled the development of the consensus statement, which is presented in this paper. The consensus statement aims to stimulate ethically acceptable research in the field of dementia and the protection of vulnerable elderly patients with dementia from application of inadequate research methods or designs.

First published on May 28, 2008, doi:10.1177/1533317508317817

American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias® 2008;23:262.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
A van der Vorm, M J F J Vernooij-Dassen, P G Kehoe, M G M O. Rikkert, E van Leeuwen, and W J M Dekkers
Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2009; 35(2): 140 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Advertisement