American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjervik, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kjervik, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®, Vol. 8, No. 6, 21-28 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/153331759300800603

Trigger events that indicate the need for proxy decision-making in cognitively impaired older persons

Diane K. Kjervik, JD, RN, FAAN

The University of Texas School of Nursing, Austin, Texas

Mary G. Weisensee, PhD, RN

University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Joanne B. Anderson, MN, RN

College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota

The purpose of this exploratory study was to ascertain the primary event or "trigger" that prompted caregivers to initiate planning for a change in monitoring or substitute decision-making needed for the older person receiving their care. Understanding the impetus to make this decision can help caregivers to anticipate needs and plan accordingly. Caregivers from the community who did not choose guardianship (N=39) and caregivers who were court-appointed guardians or conservators (N=22) were compared for their views about the trigger events, the views of their own health, number of hours in caregiving and the circumstances surrounding the decision-making experience. Three categories of trigger events were identified:

  • • Physical;
  • • Emotional/cognitive; and
  • Situational events with the vast majority of triggers falling into the first two categories.

Guardians as a group were younger, provided fewer hours of caregiving and rated themselves healthier than the other caregivers. A variety of situational stressors were identified by respondents with time and financial concerns the primary concerns. Further research with a wider variety of caregiving dyads is recommended to examine the decision-making process involved and to further validate the categorization of trigger events.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?