This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Drebing, C. Articles by Herz, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Drebing, C. Articles by Herz, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Documenting pathways to dementia care: Relative validity of questionnaire, interview, and medical record formats

Rachel Movitz, PsyD

Paula Lyon, MA

Tamara Harden, MS

Ellen McCarty, PhD, RN, CS

Lawrence Herz, MD

Bedford VA Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

One of the shortcomings of the pathways-to-care literature is the lack of empirical support for the validity of the data collection methods. This study uses three common formats to collect retrospective pathways-to-care data for adults who have been diagnosed with possible or probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) and compares indicators to evaluate their relative validity. Forty family caregivers of adults diagnosed with possible or probable AD were recruited from the caregiver registry of the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Core Center (BU ADCC). In each of three formats (questionnaire, structured interview, and medical record review), data were collected regarding four key events in the pathway to dementia care: first appearance of symptoms, first verbalized recognition of symptoms, first effort to seek professional help, and first diagnosis by a professional. In addition to the dates of these events, researchers attempted to determine: the first verbalized concern about the symptoms, who first sought professional help, what professional was first approached, and what professional made the first diagnosis. In a consensus meeting, data collected in all three formats were reviewed, and a consensus on the most likely answers to all questions was recorded and compared to data collected in each format. The results suggest that the three formats are not equivalent in terms of concurrent validity. While substantial agreement is found among data collection methods, the validity of the structured interview format and the medical record review is most consistently supported by the data in this study. Questionnaire data resulted in underestimates of delays and correlated poorly with other data sources, including the consensus judgment.

Key Words: pathways to care • Alzheimer's disease • validity

American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®, Vol. 19, No. 3, 187-197 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/153331750401900306


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. McClendon, K. A. Smyth, and M. M. Neundorfer Long-term-care placement and survival of persons with Alzheimer's disease. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2006; 61(4): P220 - P227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]