This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mayers, K. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mayers, K. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The decision for civil commitment by jury trial and the respondent with a diagnosis of dementia

Geropsvchiatric Medical Unit, Western State Hospital, Tacoma, Washington

Difficulty communicating with the moderately to severely demented patient in a civil commitment proceeding is discussed. The patient is not always able to indicate whether s/he wants a jury trial or a hearing by judge (or court commissioner). At times, the manner in which the judge or attorney communicates may contribute to the patient 's inability to comprehend. Two cases are provided which demonstrate these difficulties. Suggestions are made to simplify communication in the courtroom and to increase the likelihood that the patient will understand. A brief structured interview is included to facilitate the process of obtaining an indication from the patient as to whether s/he wants a jury trial or a hearing by judge (or court commissioner).

American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®, Vol. 11, No. 3, 40-43 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/153331759601100307


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?